
- ÀúÀÚ
- ¹Ú°æÈ¯ ¡¤ Àå¹ÌÈñ
- ±¹¹®Á¦¸ñ
- Á¤½Å°£È£»çÀÇ °Ý¸® ¡¤ °¹Ú Àû¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ¿äÀΠŽ»ö: Æ÷Ä¿½º ±×·ì ÀÎÅͺä Àû¿ë
- ¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ
- Exploring Decision-Making Factors of Psychiatric Nurses in the Application of Seclusion and Restraint: Applying Focus Group Interviews
- ±¹¹®Å°¿öµå
- ½ÅüÀû °¹Ú, ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤, Á¤½Å°£È£, Æ÷Ä¿½º ±×·ì, ÁúÀû ¿¬±¸
- ¿µ¹®Å°¿öµå
- Restraint, Physical; Decision making; Psychiatric nursing; Focus groups; Qualitative research
- ÃâÆÇÁ¤º¸
- 27±Ç 4È£ pp. 380-393
- ¹ßÇà³â¿ù
- 2018³â 12¿ù
- ÃÊ·Ï
- Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore psychiatric nurses¡¯ decision making in the use of seclusion and
restraint (SR). Methods: Data were collected using focus group interviews. Two focus group interviews were held with
a total of 10 psychiatric nurse participants. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data were analyzed using
qualitative content analysis. Results: Eleven categories emerged from three main themes. All the themes describe
factors that participants took into account when deciding whether to implement SR: 1) Personal factors area: ¡®Personal
attributes of nurses,¡¯ ¡®Attitude of nurses regarding SR,¡¯ ¡®Nurses¡¯ physical and emotional states,¡¯ ¡®Negative experiences
of nurses related to SR¡¯; 2) Relational factors area: ¡®The level of cooperation between nurses and doctors,¡¯ ¡®Role
models created by seniors and colleagues,¡¯ ¡®The level of support by nursing assistants,¡¯ ¡®Therapeutic relations with
patients¡¯; and 3) Environmental factors area: ¡®Poor nursing work environment,¡¯ ¡®Atmosphere of ward regarding SR,¡¯
and ¡®Social atmosphere to raise alarm about SR.¡¯ Conclusion: These findings should be considered in the evaluation
of the use of SR in psychiatric hospital settings and appropriate strategies used to help minimize the use of restraint.
- ÷ºÎ ÆÄÀÏ
27-4-380-Àå¹ÌÈñ-ÃÖÁ¾-.pdf
|